Comparing Noah and Utnapishtim’s Floods: Similarities in Ancient Myths

725 words, 2 pages, 4 min read
Table of content

Introduction

When we think about floods in ancient literature, two stories often come to mind: the biblical account of Noah and the epic tale of Utnapishtim from the Mesopotamian Gilgamesh epic. At first glance, these narratives may seem worlds apart—one steeped in Judeo-Christian tradition and the other rooted in ancient Near Eastern mythology. However, as we delve deeper into these two accounts, it becomes increasingly clear that they share a surprising number of similarities. By examining the common themes and elements within both stories, we can gain a richer understanding of how different cultures have grappled with the concept of divine wrath, human survival, and moral responsibility.

The Divine Warning

Both Noah and Utnapishtim receive forewarnings from divine beings regarding an impending flood. In Noah’s case, God speaks directly to him, informing him that He has decided to cleanse the earth due to mankind’s wickedness (Genesis 6:13). Similarly, Utnapishtim is warned by the god Ea (also known as Enki) about a catastrophic flood destined to destroy humanity because of their noise and disturbance. The fact that both characters are chosen to receive this critical information highlights their unique relationship with the divine—both men are seen as righteous or favored individuals within their respective narratives.

The Construction of Arks

One striking similarity between Noah’s story and that of Utnapishtim lies in their construction of vessels designed for survival. Noah is instructed to build an ark made from gopher wood and coated with pitch (Genesis 6:14-16). This ark becomes his refuge along with his family and pairs of every animal on Earth during the flood. On the other hand, Utnapishtim constructs a massive boat described as being almost like a cube (the dimensions are given in sixes), which is meant to withstand the tumultuous waters unleashed by the gods (Epic of Gilgamesh XI). The act of building these arks serves as an important narrative device; it emphasizes themes such as obedience, faithfulness, and preparation for dire circumstances.

The Flood Itself

When it comes to describing the floods themselves, both accounts depict cataclysmic events characterized by heavy rainfall and rising waters. In Genesis 7:17-24, we read about rain falling for forty days and nights until “all high mountains under the entire heavens were covered.” In contrast, Gilgamesh describes how “the water rose up above all mountains” after seven days had passed (Epic of Gilgamesh XI). These vivid portrayals contribute to a sense of impending doom—both stories convey that no one can escape this divine retribution except for those who have been chosen.

Survival Amidst Catastrophe

The aftermaths in both narratives reveal another layer of similarity regarding survival amidst catastrophe. After disembarking from their respective vessels onto dry land—a new beginning—their actions represent rebirth. Noah offers sacrifices unto God out of gratitude for being saved (Genesis 8:20), while Utnapishtim makes offerings to appease various gods who had taken part in this destructive event (Epic of Gilgamesh XI). These acts symbolize not only gratitude but also an acknowledgment that life continues despite calamity—a theme deeply embedded within human experience.

Moral Implications

A significant element present in both tales involves moral implications tied to humanity’s behavior leading up to each flood event. In Genesis 6:5-6, it is stated that God observed widespread wickedness among humans—their thoughts were “only evil all the time,” prompting His decision for judgment through flooding. Conversely, in Mesopotamian mythology represented by Utnapishtim’s narrative framework provided via Enlil’s fury at mankind’s clamor indicates dissatisfaction with humanity’s noise rather than outright evil behavior per se; still resulting tragically disastrous consequences nonetheless demonstrates how different cultures interpret morality through their mythologies.

Concluding Thoughts

As we unravel these similarities between Noah’s Ark narrative from Judeo-Christian traditions alongside its Mesopotamian counterpart featuring Utnapishtim’s story woven into Epic tales—it becomes evident there exists a shared cultural experience reflecting universal concerns about morality & existence amidst calamities faced throughout history thus shaping beliefs around deities’ justice & mercy amongst societies worldwide! Ultimately highlighting our innate need for stories that resonate across time transcending boundaries revealing common threads binding us together!

References

  • The Holy Bible: New International Version.
  • Sumerian Mythology: A Study Of Spiritual And Literary Achievement In Ancient Sumer.
  • Eleanor Robson – “The Language Of Mathematics In Ancient Mesopotamia”.
  • The Epic Of Gilgamesh – Translated by Andrew George.
  • Noah’s Ark – Biblical Story Overview | Britannica.com.

Learn the cost and time for your paper

1 page (275 words)
Deadline in: 0 days

No need to pay just yet!

Picture of Sophia Hale
Sophia Hale

This essay was reviewed by