Comparing Dulce Et Decorum Est and The Soldier

419 words, 1 pages, 2 min read
Table of content

When comparing the poems “Dulce Et Decorum Est” by Wilfred Owen and “The Soldier” by Rupert Brooke, it is evident that they both provide contrasting perspectives on war. While Owen’s poem exposes the harsh realities of warfare, Brooke’s work glorifies the idea of dying for one’s country.

Dulce Et Decorum Est: The Horrors of War

In “Dulce Et Decorum Est,” Wilfred Owen vividly depicts the gruesome experiences of soldiers during World War I. Through graphic imagery and stark language, he reveals the physical and emotional toll that war takes on individuals. The poem exposes the senseless violence, suffering, and trauma that soldiers endure on the battlefield. Owen challenges the notion that it is noble and honorable to die for one’s country, arguing instead that war brings only pain and destruction.

The Soldier: Nationalistic Ideals

In contrast, Rupert Brooke’s “The Soldier” romanticizes war and portrays it as a noble sacrifice for one’s nation. The poem reflects a patriotic sentiment, celebrating the idea of giving one’s life for England. Brooke idealizes death in battle as a way to achieve immortality and honor. Unlike Owen’s raw depiction of war as brutal and dehumanizing, Brooke’s poem glorifies heroism and patriotism.

Comparison

While both poets address themes of war and sacrifice, their perspectives couldn’t be more different. Owen condemns warfare as a senseless tragedy that destroys lives, while Brooke embraces it as a valiant act of courage and devotion to one’s country.

Owen’s anti-war stance is clear in his portrayal of soldiers suffering from gas attacks on the battlefield: “Bent double like old beggars under sacks / Knock-kneed coughing like hags.” His words evoke a visceral reaction from readers, highlighting the brutality and horror of combat.

In contrast, Brooke’s poem exudes nationalistic pride and reverence for England: “If I should die think only this of me / That there’s some corner in a foreign field / That is forever England.” He emphasizes the honor in sacrificing oneself for the greater good of one’s nation.

Conclusion

Overall, “Dulce Et Decorum Est” by Wilfred Owen offers a poignant critique of war by exposing its devastating impact on individuals, while “The Soldier” by Rupert Brooke celebrates heroism and patriotism in times of conflict. These two poems present contrasting views on warfare – one bleakly realistic and grim; the other idealistically patriotic – showcasing how different perceptions can shape our understanding of human conflicts.

References:
– “Dulce Et Decorum Est”
– “The Soldier”
– World War I Poetry
– Poems about War
– British Poets
– Literary Criticism

Learn the cost and time for your paper

1 page (275 words)
Deadline in: 0 days

No need to pay just yet!

Picture of Sophia Hale
Sophia Hale

This essay was reviewed by