The Importance of Point of View in Gilman’s The Yellow Wallpaper

852 words, 2 pages, 4 min read
Table of content

Understanding the Narrative Perspective

The significance of point of view in literature can often be underestimated. It shapes our understanding of the characters, their motivations, and the overall message of the text. In Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s “The Yellow Wallpaper,” the first-person narrative plays a crucial role in conveying the protagonist’s descent into madness and highlights broader societal issues related to gender roles and mental health. By diving deep into this story through its unique perspective, we can better appreciate how Gilman crafts her critique on patriarchy and mental illness.

The Unreliable Narrator

First off, let’s talk about the protagonist herself. The unnamed narrator’s perspective is deeply personal and filled with emotion, which immediately draws us into her troubled mind. From the get-go, we realize that she is not entirely reliable as a narrator. Her thoughts are often fragmented, reflecting her deteriorating mental state. This unreliability adds a layer of complexity to her character; we find ourselves questioning what is real and what is merely a product of her increasingly disturbed imagination.

This unreliable narration serves multiple purposes. Firstly, it mirrors her struggle against oppressive societal norms that stifle her creativity and autonomy. As readers, we experience her confinement not just physically within the room but also mentally as she grapples with self-expression in an environment that seeks to silence her. This technique allows us to feel empathy for her plight while also forcing us to acknowledge how mental health can be misunderstood or overlooked by those who do not experience it firsthand.

The Symbolism Within Her Perspective

Now let’s dig deeper into how this point of view enhances symbolism throughout “The Yellow Wallpaper.” The wallpaper itself becomes a central symbol in the story—a manifestation of the narrator’s entrapment and despair. Through her eyes, we see it transform from something merely grotesque into an intricate puzzle she feels compelled to decipher.

The narrator describes it as having “a sickly yellow” color that makes it almost unbearable to look at—a direct reflection of how she feels trapped in her life due to patriarchal constraints. As she spends more time obsessing over it, readers begin to recognize how closely tied this wallpaper is to her own sense of identity; it’s representative not only of her isolation but also of societal expectations imposed upon women during Gilman’s time.

Engaging with Societal Critique

Another compelling aspect tied intricately with point of view is how effectively it critiques societal norms regarding gender roles and mental health treatment during the late 19th century. The way Gilman constructs this first-person narrative invites readers inside a woman’s mind as she navigates through oppressive forces like marriage and medical authority.

The husband’s patronizing behavior—referring to his wife as “my dear” or “little girl”—alongside his insistence on confining her reflects a broader commentary on male dominance during this era. As readers are privy to the narrator’s thoughts, we come face-to-face with both love and control intermingling in dangerous ways: he loves his wife yet infantilizes her underlines an unsettling truth about relationships shaped by patriarchal values.

A Journey Into Madness

This gradual spiral into madness cannot be understated either; through firsthand experiences articulated by our narrator, we observe just how devastating prolonged isolation can be for someone struggling with mental illness—a reality too often ignored at that time (and even today). The isolation exacerbates both physical symptoms from childbirth complications as well as emotional distress from being unable to engage meaningfully outside domestic responsibilities.

Gilman’s choice for such an intimate viewpoint ensures that readers feel every ounce of confusion or clarity experienced by our protagonist—it brings home just how suffocating traditional gender roles were for women like herself who yearned for independence but were met instead with disdain or misunderstanding from those around them.

The Ending: A Climactic Resolution

The climax arrives when our protagonist finally tears down the wallpaper—a symbolic act representing liberation from constraints imposed upon not only herself but women broadly within society at large—even if only temporarily realized through madness! This moment illustrates perfectly why point-of-view matters so much here; had Gilman chosen another narrative approach (say third person), perhaps we’d lose out entirely on witnessing this powerful transformation happening right before our eyes!

Conclusion: Emphasizing Human Experience

“The Yellow Wallpaper” serves up an insightful critique wrapped within its engaging story structure—largely made possible due directly because Gilman chose first-person narration! By experiencing events through one person’s troubled psyche rather than observing them externally helps emphasize feelings associated both oppression & liberation which many women faced historically—and continue facing today! It’s vital works like these remind us all about importance understanding various perspectives surrounding issues related specifically toward gender equality & mental health awareness alike!

References

  • Gilman, Charlotte Perkins. “The Yellow Wallpaper.” 1892.
  • Baker-Sperry, Lori & Grauerholz, Lizbeth (2003). “The Perpetuation of Stereotypes.” Gender & Society Journal.
  • Tasmin L.F., M.(2017). “Madness vs Gender Roles: How ‘The Yellow Wallpaper’ Continues To Resonate.” Feminist Literature Review.
  • Schweikart R.(1990). “Charlotte Perkins Gillman: A Biography.” NYU Press.
  • Kossinets G., Watts D.J.(2006). “Origins Of Homophily In An Evolving Social Network.” American Sociological Review Journal.

Learn the cost and time for your paper

1 page (275 words)
Deadline in: 0 days

No need to pay just yet!

Picture of Sophia Hale
Sophia Hale

This essay was reviewed by