When we dive into the world of cinema, particularly films that explore social themes, it’s impossible to ignore how these narratives intertwine with political ideologies. One such film that deserves a closer look through a Marxist lens is “Pride” (2014). This movie tells the story of LGBTQ+ activists in the 1980s who formed an alliance with striking miners during a time of intense social and economic strife in Britain. By examining alienation and class struggles within this context, we can unravel how Marxism frames our understanding of solidarity across marginalized groups.
Understanding Alienation in ‘Pride’
To grasp the significance of alienation as presented in “Pride,” we first need to define what alienation means in a Marxist context. Karl Marx viewed alienation as a condition where individuals feel disconnected from their work, each other, and society at large due to capitalist structures. In “Pride,” this sense of estrangement is palpable for both LGBTQ+ individuals and striking miners. The miners face economic exploitation and brutal working conditions imposed by capitalist interests, while members of the LGBTQ+ community experience societal rejection and discrimination.
The film powerfully illustrates this duality through its characters. For instance, when Mark Ashton (played by Ben Schnetzer) rallies his friends to support the miners, he highlights their shared struggles against an oppressive system. The miners are alienated not just from their labor but also from their identities as working-class citizens fighting for dignity and recognition. Meanwhile, members of the LGBTQ+ community are depicted as being alienated from mainstream society—stripped of acceptance due to their sexual orientation.
Class Struggles: A Common Ground
One cannot discuss “Pride” without acknowledging the film’s central theme: class struggle. The alliance between queer activists and striking miners is emblematic of how different oppressed groups can unite against a common enemy—capitalism itself. The movie demonstrates that both communities suffer under similar socio-economic conditions; they are pitted against powerful elites who prioritize profit over people.
This solidarity comes into sharp focus when the characters confront prejudice within their own ranks. Initially, some miners express disdain towards gay individuals, reflecting societal norms at that time. However, through direct interaction and shared experiences—like marching together during Pride events—they begin to break down these barriers. It’s refreshing to see how “Pride” portrays this evolution rather than glossing over tensions; it shows us that building solidarity requires effort and understanding.
The Role of Community
A significant aspect of overcoming alienation lies in community-building, which “Pride” showcases beautifully. When Mark leads his group to support the miners financially during their strike—a gesture born out of empathy—their relationships deepen beyond mere political alliances; they become a family united by shared goals and mutual respect.
This theme resonates well with Marxist ideology where collective action is essential for enacting change. As various characters learn about each other’s hardships—whether it’s losing loved ones or facing violence—their empathy fosters genuine connections. These bonds ultimately serve as a mechanism for combating alienation since they affirm each individual’s humanity amidst broader societal neglect.
Cultural Impact: Reflection Beyond Cinema
The cultural implications extended beyond “Pride” itself; it challenges viewers today to consider our own roles in addressing issues like class struggle and social justice. While the film captures historical events from decades past, its messages remain relevant today amid ongoing discussions about inequality based on class or sexual identity.
“Pride” encourages audiences not only to empathize with marginalized communities but also invites them into activism—suggesting that even small actions can lead toward greater change when communities come together for mutual support against capitalism’s exploitative nature.
Conclusion: Lessons Learned
In conclusion, analyzing “Pride” through a Marxist lens reveals profound insights about alienation and class struggles while highlighting crucial lessons about solidarity among oppressed groups. The film reminds us that regardless of our differences—be they rooted in sexuality or economic status—we share common battles against systemic oppression fueled by capitalist exploitation.
The journey toward unity may be fraught with challenges; however, as seen throughout “Pride,” fostering dialogue among diverse voices creates pathways toward liberation for all involved—not just one group at another’s expense—but as interconnected allies striving together toward justice.
References
- Marx, K., & Engels, F., (1848). The Communist Manifesto.
- Eagleton, T., (2011). Why Marx Was Right.
- Parker, G., (2015). Queer Activism After Marriage Equality: Some Reflections on Pride UK 2015.’
- Bennett J., & Sutherland A., (2019). Class Struggles Revisited: Contemporary Perspectives on Historical Movements.’
- Pride (Film), directed by Matthew Warchus (2014).
