Analysis of Human Drives in Prebble’s Enron and Marlowe’s Doctor Faustus

738 words, 2 pages, 4 min read
Table of content

Introduction: The Nature of Human Ambition

The exploration of human drives—our insatiable desires, ambitions, and fears—has long been a prominent theme in literature. Two works that delve deep into the complexities of these drives are Lucy Prebble’s play “Enron” and Christopher Marlowe’s “Doctor Faustus.” While separated by centuries, both texts vividly portray how unbridled ambition can lead to one’s downfall. They offer a powerful commentary on the human condition, reflecting our struggles with moral ambiguity and the pursuit of power.

Ambition as a Double-Edged Sword

At the heart of both “Enron” and “Doctor Faustus” lies a central character driven by an overwhelming desire for success. In Marlowe’s play, Doctor Faustus is a brilliant scholar who becomes discontented with traditional forms of knowledge. His ambition leads him to make a Faustian bargain with Mephistopheles in exchange for supernatural powers. This choice epitomizes humanity’s thirst for more—more knowledge, more power, more everything. However, as we all know from both the story itself and its numerous adaptations, this quest ultimately leads to Faustus’s tragic demise.

In “Enron,” we see similar themes played out through characters like Jeffrey Skilling and Kenneth Lay. Their relentless pursuit of wealth and corporate dominance reflects the intoxicating allure of capitalism during the late 20th century. The narrative lays bare how their ambition blinds them to ethical considerations; they manipulate numbers and exploit systems without regard for consequences. Both plays expose a critical aspect of human nature: when ambition goes unchecked, it can spiral into greed that corrupts not only individuals but entire systems.

The Role of Knowledge

Knowledge serves as both a tool and weapon in these narratives. For Doctor Faustus, acquiring knowledge is not enough; he craves ultimate control over life itself—a godlike status that he believes can be achieved through his pact with Mephistopheles. This desire showcases humanity’s ongoing struggle against limitations imposed by nature or society; it raises questions about whether one should seek absolute power at any cost.

Conversely, in “Enron,” knowledge is depicted as something malleable—numbers manipulated to craft an appealing narrative for investors while masking underlying issues within the company. Here we see how information becomes weaponized; rather than illuminating truth or guiding decisions towards ethical outcomes, it serves purely transactional purposes aimed at maximizing profit margins at any expense.

Moral Ambiguity: Choices and Consequences

A recurring theme within both plays is moral ambiguity—the gray areas where right meets wrong become increasingly blurred due to self-interest or societal pressures. Faustus grapples with remorse yet continues down his dark path even after witnessing glimpses of damnation approaching him closer each day—a testament to humanity’s frailty when faced with temptation.

In parallel fashion, Prebble reveals characters wrestling between greed-driven choices while facing impending repercussions from their actions throughout “Enron.” There comes a moment when Lay must decide whether he will continue supporting Skilling’s dubious strategies or protect stakeholders’ interests instead—an ethical dilemma that ultimately loses relevance amid growing ambition eclipsing sound judgment.

The Tragic Flaw: Hubris

A fascinating element shared by both plays is hubris—the excessive pride leading protagonists towards catastrophic endings. For Faustus specifically, his arrogance blinds him from understanding true repentance until it is too late; instead believing himself above reproach simply because he possesses magical powers bestowed upon him temporarily by Mephistopheles.

Similarly represented among executives portrayed within “Enron,” Skilling exhibits unwavering confidence concerning financial projections regardless of mounting evidence suggesting trouble ahead—all stemming from inherent hubris preventing acknowledgment shortcomings despite clear warning signs littered throughout his ambitious ventures until collapse ensues dramatically revealing fallacies built upon illusionary successes hidden behind flashy accounting practices!

Conclusion: A Cautionary Tale Across Time

The cautionary tales woven into Prebble’s “Enron” and Marlowe’s “Doctor Faustus” transcend their respective eras while illustrating timeless truths about human drives shaped largely by ambition intertwined intricately often leading individuals down treacherous paths resulting ultimately destructive consequences stemming directly choices made without reflection upon implications involved therein! The unyielding pursuits drive many aspects contemporary society today—from tech moguls seeking greater control over innovations shaping lives others around world—to financial titans prioritizing short-term gains over long-term sustainability—a reminder indeed worth revisiting often across generations henceforth!

  • Marlowe, Christopher. *Doctor Faustus*. Oxford University Press.
  • Prebble, Lucy. *Enron*. Methuen Drama.
  • Shaffer , Peter . *Amadeus*. HarperCollins Publishers.
  • Bennett , Alan . *The History Boys*. Faber & Faber .
  • Peters , John . “Corporate Culture & Ethics.” Journal Of Business Ethics Vol 20 (1999): pp 171-183 .

Learn the cost and time for your paper

1 page (275 words)
Deadline in: 0 days

No need to pay just yet!

Picture of Sophia Hale
Sophia Hale

This essay was reviewed by