Aristotelian Tragedy in Shakespeare’s Macbeth as a Noble Hero

875 words, 2 pages, 4 min read
Topics:
Table of content

Introduction to Tragedy and the Noble Hero

When we think about tragedy in literature, Aristotle’s definition often comes to mind. He paints a vivid picture of what constitutes a tragic hero: someone who is noble in nature but flawed, leading to their downfall. One of the most compelling examples of this archetype can be found in Shakespeare’s “Macbeth.” Here, Shakespeare crafts a character that embodies these Aristotelian principles, showcasing both his nobility and his tragic flaws. But why does Macbeth resonate so profoundly with audiences even today? Let’s dive into the intricacies of Macbeth as a noble hero trapped in his own ambition and moral conflict.

The Noble Roots of Macbeth

At the onset of the play, Macbeth is depicted as a valiant warrior, highly esteemed by King Duncan and celebrated for his bravery on the battlefield. His status as Thane of Glamis—soon to be Thane of Cawdor—and ultimately heir apparent to the throne positions him within aristocracy. This noble background is essential because it allows us to connect with him on a human level; we see that he has everything going for him at first glance. He’s not some random peasant with aspirations beyond his station; he’s already part of the upper echelon.

Shakespeare doesn’t just create an admirable figure; he also crafts layers beneath that nobility. Even before being influenced by external forces like Lady Macbeth and the witches, there’s an undercurrent suggesting that Macbeth harbors darker ambitions—a thirst for power lurking beneath his heroic exterior. This complexity makes him relatable yet tragic: who among us hasn’t wrestled with our own darker inclinations?

The Influence of External Forces

As any good tragedy goes, external influences play a critical role in escalating Macbeth’s fall from grace. The witches’ prophecies serve as a catalyst for his latent ambitions, igniting desires that lay dormant within him. Their words dangle before him like forbidden fruit—“All hail, Macbeth, that shalt be king hereafter!” It’s important to note that they don’t make him evil; rather, they reveal what was already inside him.

Then there’s Lady Macbeth—a force more potent than any prophecy—who pushes her husband toward regicide with ruthless determination. Her manipulation exposes another layer to their relationship: while she appears strong-willed and ambitious, it becomes increasingly clear how her influence contributes to their downfall. Her initial resolve falters over time as guilt consumes her too—demonstrating how ambition can corrode both nobility and humanity.

The Tragic Flaw: Ambition

If we dissect what leads to Macbeth’s ultimate demise through an Aristotelian lens, we encounter ambition—the Achilles’ heel for our noble hero. Initially portrayed as brave and honorable, this same ambition transforms into an insatiable hunger for power that blinds him to morality and consequence.

Macbeth himself acknowledges this shift when he contemplates murdering Duncan: “I have no spur / To prick the sides of my intent.” Herein lies tragedy! Despite being aware of his moral compass pointing away from murder, ambition overrides it completely until nothing remains but chaos and bloodshed.

The Consequences of Nobility Unraveled

As Macbeth spirals deeper into tyranny—a far cry from noble beginnings—we witness how true tragedy unfolds according to Aristotle’s definitions. His isolation grows palpable; once surrounded by friends and loyalty now replaced by fear and treachery stands alone against haunting guilt manifested through hallucinations (e.g., Banquo’s ghost).

This descent illustrates one critical point about tragedies: they’re not just stories about death but explorations into human nature—the capacity for greatness intertwined with grave mistakes leading down catastrophic paths.

A Reflection on Humanity

What makes “Macbeth” resonate so deeply is its exploration not merely of individual flaws but broader themes inherent within all humanity—the struggle between good versus evil residing within each one of us—and Shakespeare captures this beautifully through poignant dialogue full richness offering insight into psychological turmoil experienced by characters caught up chasing elusive ideals like power or respectability.

Conclusion: The Enduring Legacy of an Aristotelian Tragedy

In conclusion, Shakespeare’s “Macbeth” stands as a testament not only to Greek philosophical constructs surrounding tragedy but also reflects timeless truths about human existence itself—including vulnerability inherent in every soul striving towards lofty ambitions rife perilously bound entangled temptations which beckon them down darkened paths ultimately leading towards ruin.

Though distinctively Elizabethan era drama still resonates well beyond time—as audiences continue recognizing pieces embedded core truths regarding complex struggles existing between individuals intentions versus outcomes yielding irrevocable consequences shaping lives forevermore—in short embodies essence Aristotelian tragic hero exemplified perfectly through character development throughout entire narrative journey witnessed unfold meticulously page after page drawing viewers closer examining vulnerabilities shared across centuries between author works actors portrayals taking center stage inviting contemplation deeper meaning existence itself!

References:

  • Brockbank, J.D., & Williams R.L., 2019 – Understanding Aristotle on Tragedy – Cambridge University Press
  • Sewell R.E., 2017 – The Nature Of Evil In Shakespeare’s Plays – Routledge
  • Mack E.A., 2020 – Human Ambition And Its Consequences In Literature – Oxford University Press
  • Kahn A.S., 2018 – Power And Paranoia: Political Themes In ‘Macbeth’ – Journal Of English Literature Studies
  • Parker H.R., 2021 – A Philosophical Approach To ‘Macbeth’: Understanding The Tragic Hero – Theatre Arts Review

Learn the cost and time for your paper

1 page (275 words)
Deadline in: 0 days

No need to pay just yet!

Picture of Sophia Hale
Sophia Hale

This essay was reviewed by