When we think about stories that explore the essence of humanity and the consequences of creation, two prominent works come to mind: Mary Shelley’s “Frankenstein” and Tim Burton’s “Edward Scissorhands.” At first glance, these narratives seem worlds apart—one being a Gothic novel written in the early 19th century and the other a modern fairy tale brought to life through film in the late 20th century. However, beneath their surface differences lies a rich tapestry of themes that reveal profound insights about identity, alienation, and societal rejection. In this essay, we’ll delve into how both works portray their respective protagonists as misunderstood creations caught between two worlds: that of their creators and the society that shuns them.
The Nature of Creation
At the heart of both “Frankenstein” and “Edward Scissorhands” is the theme of creation gone awry. Victor Frankenstein’s ambition leads him to construct a living being from dead matter, but he is horrified by his own creation once it comes to life. This act of creation raises ethical questions about responsibility—specifically, what obligations do creators have towards their creations? Similarly, Edward is an artificial being created by an inventor who dies before completing him. Edward’s scissor hands symbolize his unfinished nature; he is literally incomplete due to his creator’s negligence. Both Victor and Edward’s creator abandon them, leaving these beings to navigate a world that neither understands nor accepts them.
Identity Crisis
Both protagonists face existential dilemmas regarding their identities. The creature in “Frankenstein” grapples with feelings of loneliness and despair as he longs for companionship but is met with fear and hatred instead. His physical appearance—a grotesque amalgamation—becomes a barrier between him and society. Edward Scissorhands also experiences isolation stemming from his unusual appearance; despite having a gentle heart and artistic talent, his scissor hands render him incapable of fitting into normal human interactions. In both cases, we see how external appearances heavily influence one’s sense of self-worth and belonging.
The Role of Society
The societies depicted in both narratives play significant roles in shaping the destinies of Victor’s creature and Edward. In “Frankenstein,” society reacts with horror toward the creature upon its initial emergence into the world; townspeople chase him with pitchforks simply because he looks different. This brutal response reflects humanity’s tendency to reject what it cannot understand or accept as normal—a theme still relevant today as society grapples with issues surrounding difference and inclusion.
On the other hand, Burton’s suburban community initially welcomes Edward due to his novelty but soon turns against him when they perceive him as a threat—a reflection on societal hypocrisy where acceptance can swiftly turn into rejection based on fear or misunderstanding. As both characters navigate these social landscapes filled with prejudice, viewers are left questioning how much control individuals have over their fates when pitted against societal norms.
The Quest for Connection
A poignant aspect shared by both narratives is the desire for connection—the fundamental human need for love and acceptance drives each character forward. The creature seeks companionship desperately; despite committing acts deemed monstrous out of despair (including murder), these actions stem from deep-seated pain rather than innate evilness. Conversely, Edward yearns for emotional intimacy but finds himself unable to forge genuine connections because those around him can’t look past his physical differences.
Interestingly enough, while “Frankenstein” portrays relationships more somberly—with disastrous consequences stemming from lack of understanding—the world depicted in “Edward Scissorhands” offers glimpses at hope through its focus on kindness amidst chaos exemplified by Kim’s character who sees beyond Edward’s façade to appreciate his true nature.
The Consequences Of Abandonment
A key takeaway from both stories is exploring how abandonment affects individual lives profoundly—the void left behind shapes identities irreparably leading not only towards tragedy (in Frankenstein) but also moments tinged with bittersweet melancholy (as seen through Edwards’ journey). While one story culminates in horror fueled by vengeance against neglectful creators culminating tragically at its conclusion; another offers shades lightening dark tones showing potential warmth arising out affectionate bonds even if they remain fragile like glass sculptures crafted lovingly albeit incompletely.
Conclusion: Understanding Through Empathy
In comparing Mary Shelley’s “Frankenstein” with Tim Burton’s “Edward Scissorhands,” we uncover timeless themes revolving around creation vs destruction within interpersonal dynamics shaped primarily influenced by perceptions rooted deeply entrenched within cultural constructs defining humanity itself!. Both stories compel us toward empathy urging deeper reflections concerning our choices confronting perceived monstrosities while reminding audiences ultimately—every soul deserves compassion regardless shape/form it takes!
- Shelley M., Frankenstein: Or The Modern Prometheus
- Burtong T., Edward Scissorhands [Film]
- Cohen J.J., Monster Theory: Reading Culture
- Kennedy R., Mary Shelley: An Introduction
- Sontag S., Regarding The Pain Of Others
