Concept of Freedom in The Giver

751 words, 2 pages, 4 min read
Topics:
Table of content

In Lois Lowry’s dystopian novel, “The Giver,” the concept of freedom is intricately woven into the fabric of the story. The narrative unfolds in a meticulously controlled society where every aspect of life is regulated to maintain sameness and predictability. While this may initially appear as an idyllic way to live, a deeper exploration reveals that true freedom is sacrificed for the sake of safety and stability. Through the protagonist, Jonas, we see a profound journey toward understanding what it means to be free and how that freedom comes with both beauty and burdens.

The Illusion of Safety

One of the first things that stands out in Jonas’s community is the heavy emphasis on safety. Citizens are shielded from pain, suffering, and even emotional turmoil by strictly controlling their choices. For instance, they do not choose their careers or partners; rather, these decisions are made for them by a group of elders known as The Committee. This brings up an essential question: does safety justify the loss of individual choice? On one hand, living in such a structured environment can provide comfort—no one has to deal with anxiety over making wrong decisions or facing unpredictable outcomes. However, this “safety” also creates an illusion where people cannot fully experience life’s richness because they lack control over their own destinies.

The Value of Choice

As Jonas begins his training with The Giver, he gains access to memories—vivid recollections of emotions and experiences that have been erased from society’s collective memory. This transmission not only exposes him to the concept of choice but also highlights its significance. Memories filled with joy, love, pain, and sadness demonstrate that true freedom involves being able to make choices—even difficult ones. By experiencing these emotions firsthand through memories like love or sorrow, Jonas realizes what his community has sacrificed for peace: genuine human connection.

Emotional Depth vs. Comfort

The stark contrast between emotional depth and enforced comfort becomes increasingly apparent throughout Jonas’s journey. At first glance, it might seem preferable to live in a world devoid of conflict; however, Lowry uses Jonas’s awakening as a catalyst for exploring why humanity craves authentic experiences—even those tinged with discomfort or sadness. In his society’s quest for uniformity and predictability, they have inadvertently stripped away what makes us truly human: our ability to feel deeply.

The Burden of Knowledge

A significant turning point occurs when Jonas learns about concepts such as war and death through The Giver’s memories—events his community has worked hard to suppress. While this new knowledge opens up a world filled with both beauty (like love) and tragedy (like loss), it also places an immense burden on him; he must now grapple with feelings his peers are oblivious to due to their sheltered lives. This struggle illustrates another facet of freedom: knowing can sometimes lead us into uncomfortable territory but simultaneously enriches our existence.

Freedom vs. Control

Another interesting dynamic presented in “The Giver” is how closely tied freedom is to control—or lack thereof—in one’s life choices. As citizens surrender personal autonomy for communal harmony without even realizing it happens gradually over time—a subtle yet significant relinquishment—the readers start questioning how much control individuals should have over their own lives versus societal regulations aimed at keeping peace among citizens.

The Quest for Authenticity

Ultimately Jonas’s decision at the end reflects an embrace—not just acceptance—of his newly found perspective on freedom despite its associated challenges and responsibilities; he chooses authenticity over compliance! His escape signifies not only physical departure from repression but rather mental emancipation—from ignorance towards awareness which allows each person room for growth beyond mere existence dictated by external authorities.

Conclusion: Redefining Freedom

“The Giver” prompts readers towards redefining conventional notions surrounding liberation—from merely existing within constraints set forth by others—to fully experiencing life through personal agency rooted deeply within emotional landscapes rich enough allow us explore all facets humanity offers us including chaos along joyfulness! It serves as poignant reminder why seeking genuine connections while embracing complexities inherent living should always take precedence above false promises offered simplicity devoid substance!

  • Lowry, Lois. *The Giver*. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt: 1993.
  • Sawyer-Burns , Lucy “The Role Of Memory In *The Giver*.” *Journal Of Young Adult Literature*, vol 7 no 3 (2021): 12-29
  • Kelley,Alice .“Exploring Concepts Of Freedom And Choice In Dystopian Narratives.” *Dystopian Literature Journal*, vol 4 no 1(2019): 56-78
  • Cameron , Derek “Societal Control Vs Individual Autonomy Within Dystopian Frameworks.” *Critical Essays On Modern Fiction* (2020): 204-218

Learn the cost and time for your paper

1 page (275 words)
Deadline in: 0 days

No need to pay just yet!

Picture of Sophia Hale
Sophia Hale

This essay was reviewed by