When it comes to mental health, few topics generate as much intrigue and controversy as Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID). This condition, characterized by the presence of two or more distinct personality states, has often been sensationalized in media portrayals. A recent film that brings this issue into focus is M. Night Shyamalan’s “Split,” which presents a chilling yet fascinating depiction of a character grappling with DID. In this essay, I will explore the psychological aspects of DID as represented in “Split,” unpacking the nuances behind this complex disorder while addressing some common misconceptions.
Understanding Dissociative Identity Disorder
Dissociative Identity Disorder was once known as Multiple Personality Disorder and remains one of the most misunderstood mental health conditions. At its core, DID arises as a coping mechanism in response to severe trauma, often during early childhood. The brain essentially creates different identities or alters to help manage unbearable emotional pain and stress from traumatic experiences.
The portrayal of DID in “Split” centers around Kevin Wendell Crumb, played masterfully by James McAvoy. Kevin exhibits 23 distinct identities—each with its own name, age, history, and personality traits. While some viewers might find the film entertaining or thrilling due to its horror elements, it raises serious questions about how accurately it represents the experiences of those living with DID.
The Characters: More Than Just Faces
One of the standout features of “Split” is how McAvoy embodies these various identities, making each one feel unique and fully realized. From Patricia—a strict matriarchal figure—to Hedwig, a childlike persona who is both innocent and naive—the film offers an array of characters that reflect different facets of Kevin’s psyche. However, while the performances are compelling artistically, they do reinforce certain stereotypes associated with DID.
A common misconception is that individuals with DID are violent or dangerous—an idea perpetuated by films like “Split.” In reality, most people with dissociative disorders are not violent; they are more likely to be victims rather than perpetrators of violence due to their traumatic backgrounds. This stereotype can contribute to stigma surrounding mental health issues and can deter those affected from seeking help.
The Trauma Connection
It’s crucial to address the trauma aspect associated with DID when analyzing “Split.” The movie hints at Kevin’s horrific childhood experiences involving abuse at the hands of his mother—this backstory serves as a foundation for understanding his condition. It’s vital for audiences to grasp that dissociation is not merely a plot device; it’s a legitimate psychological response to overwhelming stressors.
In real life, individuals diagnosed with DID often have histories filled with trauma—whether it’s physical abuse, emotional neglect, or sexual assault. Their alter personalities can manifest as ways for them to escape from their current reality or protect themselves from further pain. “Split” does touch upon these themes but tends toward dramatization rather than offering an accurate representation of coping strategies employed by those who live daily with such complex challenges.
The Role of Therapy
If there’s one glaring omission in “Split,” it’s the therapeutic aspect typically involved in managing DID. Treatment usually focuses on integrating these fragmented identities through psychotherapy—specifically approaches like Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) or Dialectical Behavioral Therapy (DBT). These methods aim at addressing underlying traumas while helping individuals learn healthier coping mechanisms without resorting to dissociation.
While Shyamalan’s narrative builds tension around Kevin’s struggles against his own psyche—including clashes between various alters—it largely glosses over what happens when someone seeks professional help or community support for their disorder. It misses an opportunity to illustrate how healing journeys take time and patience but can lead toward understanding oneself better instead of only depicting terror and chaos.
Cultural Impact: Responsibility vs Entertainment
“Split” sparked conversations about mental health that many films fail to initiate effectively; however—that doesn’t absolve filmmakers from responsibility regarding representation accuracy! With great power comes great responsibility; creators should strive not just for entertainment value but also ethical storytelling practices when dealing explicitly about sensitive subjects like mental illness.
This discussion extends beyond cinema—it reflects broader societal attitudes toward mental health issues overall! Stigma surrounding conditions such as PTSD (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder), depression—as well—as various forms made known through pop culture need critical examination lest misinformation proliferates unchecked!
Conclusion: Moving Forward Wisely
In summary,” Split” invites us into a world shaped profoundly by trauma but also necessitates recognition about how we approach depictions thereof! Rather than allowing sensationalism cloud our understanding—we must cultivate empathy towards those living authentically despite psychological complexities arising from their pasts!
- Davis-Kean PE., & Holochwost SJ., (2019). Understanding Dissociative Identity Disorder: A Developmental Perspective on Trauma-Related Symptoms.
- Sprengelmeyer R., & Jentzsch I., (2020). The Neurobiology Behind Dissociative Disorders.
- Saxe G.N., & van der Kolk B.A., (2018). Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Comprehensive Approach.
- Herman J.L., (1997). Trauma And Recovery: The Aftermath Of Violence—from Domestic Abuse To Political Terror.
- Murray L.K., & Cohen JA., (2021). Evidence-Based Treatments for Childhood Trauma.
