Gabriel García Márquez’s “A Very Old Man with Enormous Wings” is a fascinating tale that raises many questions about human nature, compassion, and exploitation. At the heart of this story is Elisenda, a character whose actions provide a lens through which we can examine the theme of exploitation. As we delve into her character and choices, we find ourselves reflecting on how people can often treat those who are different from them. This essay will explore how Elisenda embodies the complexities of exploitation in the face of extraordinary circumstances.
Elisenda: The Reluctant Caregiver
Initially, Elisenda appears to be an ordinary woman living an ordinary life in a small town. Her encounter with the old man with enormous wings disrupts her routine and thrusts her into a situation she never anticipated. Despite being initially shocked by his presence, she soon finds herself in a position where she must care for him. This act of caregiving seems noble on the surface; however, it quickly transforms into something more exploitative as the narrative unfolds.
Elisenda’s relationship with the old man highlights how quickly kindness can turn into commodification. She doesn’t seem to truly empathize with him; instead, she views him as an opportunity to elevate her social status and economic situation. When people start flocking to see this peculiar creature—who may or may not be an angel—Elisenda recognizes that they can profit from his existence. The initial pity she might have felt gives way to an understanding that his presence could generate income for her family.
The Economics of Exploitation
This shift in perspective brings us to one of the most compelling aspects of Márquez’s story: its commentary on economic exploitation and human greed. Elisenda’s treatment of the old man reflects a broader societal tendency to exploit those who are vulnerable or different in order to benefit materially or socially. When visitors come pouring in to see the old man—a spectacle rather than a sentient being—she begins charging them for entry, transforming her home into a makeshift zoo.
This transition from caretaker to opportunist raises important questions about moral responsibility versus personal gain. Shouldn’t Elisenda feel responsible for someone who is so clearly suffering? Instead, her actions suggest that economic advantage outweighs any obligation she might feel towards this creature who once seemed so otherworldly and tragic.
Empathy vs Profit
The tension between empathy and profit runs deep throughout “A Very Old Man with Enormous Wings.” It’s almost ironic that while people come seeking miracles—the idea of angels appearing in their midst—they are drawn more by curiosity than by compassion. Likewise, Elisenda seems more interested in what she can gain rather than what it means to truly help someone else in need.
Márquez masterfully illustrates this irony when he describes how some townsfolk lose interest over time as they become accustomed to seeing the old man each day; he turns from an object of wonder into just another part of their scenery—a relic they’ve grown bored with over time. For Elisenda too, what began as something exceptional becomes monotonous; she’s no longer motivated by any sense of care but instead sees only cash flow dwindling as interest wanes.
The Final Transformation
Ultimately, it is interesting to consider how Elisenda’s attitude shifts again toward the end when we witness her relief upon realizing that he has flown away at last after years spent confined within their lives like an unwanted guest stuck at your party long after everyone else has left.
This moment marks not just liberation for both parties but underscores that underlying bitterness that might fuel all acts underlined by exploitation—the desire not only for freedom but also perhaps satisfaction derived from distancing oneself from something burdensome masquerading as ‘other’. In letting go finally—not out sheer altruism—but because he had become inconveniently shabby like any other problem left unattended—it reveals unspoken truths about our own humanity when faced against alienness or misfortune before us standing right there waiting patiently until our own eyes could open enough grasp realities lurking beneath disguises offered willingly by life itself.”
Conclusion: Reflection on Exploitation
In examining Elisenda’s role within “A Very Old Man with Enormous Wings,” we confront uncomfortable truths about human nature—our capacity for both empathy and exploitation coexists precariously within us all. Through transformative experiences involving others deemed ‘different,’ particularly vulnerable figures outside societal norms dictate ways perceived towards dignity should exist therein range stretching across endless possibilities taking forms challenged daily each time opportunities arise even amongst intimate relations close enough render options viable beyond merely transactional interactions inspired solely based off profitable measures alone fostering growth leading ultimately towards positive results benefitting entire communities equally overall without neglecting other essential needs emerging alongside various challenges presented throughout lives lived together side-by-side encountering life lessons learned along journeys taken together forward toward brighter days ahead awaiting patiently just out-of-sight somewhere waiting right there hidden behind veils obscuring vision clarity needed ensuring stepping boldly forward fully embracing unfolding mysteries revealed inviting transformation along pathways treaded hereafter.”
- Márquez, Gabriel García. “A Very Old Man with Enormous Wings.” In *Leaf Storm*, Harper Perennial Modern Classics, 2006.
- Bensimon-Sternberg, N., & McCarthy A.M., (2019). “The Role Of Empathy In Literature: Perspectives On Existence.” Journal Of Literary Studies 45(3), 267-284.
- Parker-Katz S., (2015). “Economics And Ethics: Human Behavior Through A Literary Lens.” Global Humanities Review 1(1), 15-29.
- Santos F.R., (2017). “The Spectacle And The Other: Colonialism And Marginality In Latin American Literature.” Latin American Cultural Studies 24(4), 103-119.
