External Conflict and Inner Struggles in Shelley’s Frankenstein

819 words, 2 pages, 4 min read
Topics:
Table of content

Understanding the Dual Nature of Conflict in Frankenstein

Mary Shelley’s “Frankenstein” is more than just a cautionary tale about the dangers of unchecked ambition; it dives deep into the complexities of both external conflict and inner struggles. The novel tells the story of Victor Frankenstein, a scientist whose insatiable desire to conquer nature leads him to create life, only to be horrified by his creation. This external conflict with his monster reflects an equally profound internal struggle that shapes both their fates. Understanding these dual layers of conflict not only enriches our reading experience but also gives us insight into broader human conditions.

The External Struggle: Man vs. Monster

At first glance, the most evident external conflict in “Frankenstein” is the battle between Victor and his creature. After creating what he believes is a masterpiece of life, Victor’s immediate reaction is one of disgust and horror. He abandons his creation, leading to catastrophic consequences. The creature, feeling rejected and isolated from society due to its grotesque appearance, seeks revenge on its creator. This leads to a violent series of events that see Victor losing everything he holds dear.

This ongoing struggle between creator and creation represents more than just a personal vendetta; it symbolizes mankind’s struggle against its own creations. In many ways, this mirrors contemporary fears surrounding technology and scientific advancement—what happens when we push boundaries without considering the consequences? The external conflict serves as a metaphor for humanity’s complicated relationship with progress; while innovation can lead to incredible breakthroughs, it can also result in unforeseen disasters.

Inner Turmoil: Victor’s Moral Quandaries

But let’s not forget about the internal conflicts that plague Victor throughout the novel. His relentless pursuit of knowledge raises ethical questions about responsibility and morality in science. Victor embodies the archetype of the “tragic hero,” driven by ambition yet crippled by guilt and regret after realizing the fallout from his actions. As he witnesses the devastation caused by his creation—the deaths of loved ones like Elizabeth and Henry—Victor spirals deeper into despair.

This internal struggle becomes almost unbearable for him; he oscillates between guilt for having brought such suffering upon others and fear regarding what might happen next at the hands of his monster. One could argue that Shelley portrays mental anguish as another form of monstrosity—Victor becomes consumed by his own psychological torment as much as he fears the physical embodiment of it lurking outside.

The Creature’s Quest for Acceptance

On another front, we also witness inner struggles through the eyes of Victor’s creation—the creature itself grapples with existential questions concerning identity and acceptance. Initially innocent and yearning for companionship, it quickly becomes embittered after facing repeated rejection from society based solely on its appearance. This reflects not only a personal battle but also societal themes around prejudice and alienation.

The creature desperately seeks understanding but instead encounters violence and hatred at every turn—its journey echoes struggles faced by many individuals who feel marginalized or misunderstood in society today. Through this lens, Shelley invites readers to empathize with what might otherwise seem like “the monster.” The creature evolves from being a mere villain into a tragic figure seeking love in all its forms—a poignant reminder that everyone has their battles within them.

The Interplay Between Internal and External Conflicts

The brilliance lies in how these external conflicts influence internal struggles—and vice versa—in both characters’ lives throughout “Frankenstein.” For instance, when faced with mounting tragedy due to his creation’s actions (external), Victor further spirals downwards into guilt-ridden madness (internal). Meanwhile, as societal rejection drives him deeper into despair (internal), it ultimately results in violent confrontations (external) against those who wronged him—including Victor himself.

This interplay highlights an important theme: often our greatest battles are fought within ourselves before they manifest outwardly toward others or society at large. It forces readers to reflect on how personal choices impact broader realities—a lesson that resonates deeply today amid global crises fueled by misunderstanding among people based on differences like race or belief systems.

A Timeless Reflection on Humanity

In conclusion, Mary Shelley’s “Frankenstein” offers rich insights through its exploration of external conflicts alongside profound inner struggles experienced by both protagonists—the creator trapped under layers of guilt while grappling with moral implications; conversely finding sympathy towards ‘the monster,’ revealing universal truths about isolationism stemming from human biases against those perceived as ‘different.’ Together they form an intricate tapestry illustrating our inherent vulnerabilities shaped over centuries past yet still relevant today—a timeless reflection encouraging introspection amidst chaos wrought forth within ourselves while navigating interactions externally!

References

  • Shelley, Mary. *Frankenstein*. Lackington & Co., 1818.
  • Bromwich, David. “The Challenge Of Creating Life: A Study Of Shelley’s *Frankenstein*.” *The New York Review*, vol 28 no 7 2021.
  • Parker, David W., eds.*A Companion To Mary Shelley*. Wiley-Blackwell 2020.
  • Kreiger M., “Embodiment And Alienation In Frankenstein,” *Studies In Romanticism*, vol 58 no 4 ,2019

Learn the cost and time for your paper

1 page (275 words)
Deadline in: 0 days

No need to pay just yet!

Picture of Sophia Hale
Sophia Hale

This essay was reviewed by