Human Behavior in Shelley’s Frankenstein and Čapek’s R.U.R.

638 words, 2 pages, 3 min read
Topics:
Table of content

When we dive into the realms of classic literature, two names often come up in discussions about human behavior and the consequences of our actions: Mary Shelley’s “Frankenstein” and Karel Čapek’s “R.U.R.” While these works stem from different time periods and genres, they both grapple with profound questions about what it means to be human, the moral implications of creation, and the potential consequences of playing God. In this essay, we’ll explore how these themes manifest in each work and what they reveal about human nature.

The Quest for Knowledge

First off, let’s talk about the relentless quest for knowledge that characterizes both Victor Frankenstein in Shelley’s novel and the scientists in Čapek’s play. Victor is a quintessential example of a man consumed by his ambition. He is so desperate to unlock the secrets of life that he ultimately creates a being that he cannot control. His famous quote “I ought to be thy Adam; but I am rather the fallen angel” encapsulates his failure not only as a creator but also as a moral being. This reflects an essential aspect of human behavior: our insatiable thirst for understanding can lead us down dangerous paths.

On the other hand, Čapek presents a slightly different angle through his robots—beings created to serve humanity but who eventually rise against their creators. The scientists in “R.U.R.” are driven by industrial advancement and efficiency, perhaps reflecting early 20th-century anxieties about capitalism and labor. They have succeeded in creating artificial life but have overlooked their responsibility towards their creations. In both stories, we see that while striving for knowledge can yield great advances, it also comes with ethical considerations that must not be ignored.

The Nature of Creation

Now let’s dig deeper into creation itself—what does it mean to create life? In “Frankenstein,” Victor Frankenstein’s act is steeped in hubris; he wants to transcend natural boundaries without considering the ramifications. The creature becomes an embodiment of his failures—a reflection not just of Victor’s ambitions but also of society’s rejection and isolationary tendencies toward those who are different or misunderstood.

In contrast, Čapek’s robots initially seem devoid of emotional depth or individuality; they are tools designed purely for labor. However, as R.U.R progresses, they begin to develop their own consciousness and desires. This brings up questions about identity and autonomy—the very essence of what it means to be alive or ‘human.’ Unlike Victor’s creature who yearns for acceptance yet faces relentless rejection, Čapek’s robots begin to challenge their roles as mere servitors by seeking independence.

The Consequences of Isolation

A major theme intertwined with creation is isolation—a fate faced by both Victor Frankenstein and his creature as well as R.U.R.’s robots as they become self-aware. After creating his monster, Victor becomes increasingly isolated from society due to guilt over abandoning it after birth; he neglects relationships with friends and family which further amplifies his despair.

The creature itself experiences deep loneliness because it is rejected by everyone due to its grotesque appearance—a metaphorical representation often seen in discussions surrounding societal prejudice against those who do not conform to conventional norms. Both creator and creation end up alone; this speaks volumes about how important companionship is for psychological well-being—a fundamental aspect inherent within humanity itself.

In “R.U.R,” isolation manifests differently among robots who start off devoid of personal connections but soon desire more than servitude—they crave recognition beyond their roles imposed upon them by humans! As they evolve emotionally (a point where one may argue they’re attaining ‘human’ qualities), they reject any notion limiting them solely based on function; here lies an ironic twist regarding freedom—robots recognize their oppression even if initially programmed only for productivity!

Both texts push us toward pondering broader societal implications resulting from unchecked ambition along with technological advancements without regard towards ethicality! Shelley’s cautionary tale emphasizes how individual pursuits can result not just harm individuals involved—but entire communities torn apart through neglecting foundational morals tied deeply within humanity.” R.U.R.” further complicates matters depicting societies built on exploiting artificial lives until those beings revolt against such oppression highlighting potential dangers ahead stemming directly from dehumanization occurring amongst labor forces.

Conclusion: Reflecting on Humanity

Ultimately through examining both “Frankenstein” & “R.U.R,” one cannot escape contemplating complex facets encompassing existence including responsibility tied closely between creator & created while questioning consequences stemming towards humanity at large caused via disregard found within pursuit progress unchecked motives shaping destiny further still resonate today reminding us never lose sight ethics amidst chaos technological evolution propelling forward rapidly across all aspects modern day living!

References

  • Shelley M., 1818. Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus.
  • Čapek K., 1920. R.U.R.: Rossum’s Universal Robots.
  • Bramwell H., 2015. Human Nature in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein: An Exploration Through Psychoanalysis.
  • Pawlikowski J., 2008. Robots as Modern Myth: Human Autonomy versus Technological Progress in Karel Čapek’s R.U.R..
  • Kirkpatrick L.A., 2003.. Exploring Science Fiction Themes In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein And Karel Capek’s R.U.R..

Learn the cost and time for your paper

1 page (275 words)
Deadline in: 0 days

No need to pay just yet!

Picture of Sophia Hale
Sophia Hale

This essay was reviewed by