Society’s Role in Shaping Gender in The Color Purple and To Kill a Mockingbird

862 words, 2 pages, 4 min read
Table of content

Understanding Gender Through Literature

When we dive into the pages of literature, we often find ourselves confronted with complex themes that resonate with societal issues. Two powerful novels that explore the theme of gender are Alice Walker’s “The Color Purple” and Harper Lee’s “To Kill a Mockingbird.” Both texts not only tell compelling stories but also reveal how society shapes our understanding of gender roles and expectations. This essay will delve into how these two novels illuminate the impact of society on gender, highlighting the struggles faced by their characters in navigating a world dictated by rigid social norms.

The Societal Framework in The Color Purple

“The Color Purple” is set in the early 20th century American South, where African American women face both racism and sexism. The protagonist, Celie, begins her life in a world dominated by men—her father abuses her, and she is married off to an equally abusive husband. From the get-go, Celie’s identity is shaped by societal expectations; she is expected to be submissive and silent. However, Walker brilliantly portrays Celie’s journey towards self-discovery as she grapples with her place within this oppressive framework.

What makes “The Color Purple” particularly poignant is how it reveals the intersectionality of race and gender. Society dictates that Celie should accept her status as inferior because she is both Black and female. Yet through her relationships with other women—like Shug Avery and Sofia—Celie begins to reclaim her voice. These interactions challenge societal norms that dictate femininity as weakness or subservience. For instance, Shug’s unapologetic sexuality and Sofia’s defiance against traditional gender roles present alternatives for Celie to consider, pushing against the boundaries set by their patriarchal society.

Gender Expectations in To Kill a Mockingbird

Similarly, “To Kill a Mockingbird” presents its own commentary on gender through Scout Finch’s perspective as a young girl growing up in Alabama during the Great Depression. From an early age, Scout feels constricted by societal expectations of femininity—she’s encouraged to wear dresses and act like a ‘lady,’ yet she prefers overalls and roughhousing with boys. Through Scout’s eyes, Lee critiques how society imposes rigid standards on both genders while simultaneously exposing hypocrisy within those very standards.

Scout’s relationship with her father Atticus showcases another dimension of societal influence on gender roles. Atticus embodies progressive values; he respects Scout’s individuality while gently challenging traditional views on masculinity and femininity. He teaches his children empathy—a trait considered more feminine—and encourages them to stand up for what is right regardless of public opinion or societal pressure. This nurturing environment allows Scout to develop an identity that’s not solely defined by her gender but rather by her morals and actions.

The Consequences of Rigid Gender Roles

Both novels highlight the consequences faced when individuals conform too strictly to societal norms regarding gender. In “The Color Purple,” characters like Harpo struggle under the weight of these expectations; he believes he must assert dominance over Sofia due to his upbringing but ultimately realizes that true strength lies in love rather than control. This realization serves as a critique of toxic masculinity perpetuated by society.

In contrast, Boo Radley from “To Kill a Mockingbird” symbolizes another tragic consequence: isolation resulting from fear driven by social stigma related to masculinity or perceived ‘otherness.’ Society brands Boo as an outcast based purely on rumors rather than facts about who he truly is—a common experience for many who don’t fit neatly into established categories dictated by culture or tradition.

A Path Towards Liberation

Ultimately, both Walker and Lee illustrate pathways toward liberation from restrictive gender roles through their protagonists’ journeys toward self-acceptance and empowerment. In “The Color Purple,” Celie’s transformation—from voicelessness to self-assuredness—is emblematic of resilience against oppression rooted deep within societal constructs about race and gender.

Similarly, Scout Finch learns that courage isn’t just physical bravery; it also includes standing firm against injustices prevalent in society—even when they are deeply ingrained beliefs about what it means to be ‘female’ or ‘male.’ By shedding light on these individual journeys amid broader cultural critiques presented in both narratives, readers gain insight into how society molds our understanding—and sometimes misunderstanding—of gender roles.

The Impact of Society Remains Relevant

The exploration found within “The Color Purple” and “To Kill a Mockingbird” serves as essential reminders that our current discussions surrounding gender still echo many themes depicted within these classic texts today—from issues concerning feminism to discussions around toxic masculinity or LGBTQ+ representation—all stem from longstanding social structures demanding conformity at great personal cost.

As we engage with literature tackling such significant themes head-on across generations past into contemporary contexts—we can recognize patterns emerge signaling our ongoing struggle for equity regarding how we perceive identities formed within confines imposed upon us largely due simply being born into specific circumstances beyond individual control!

  • Lee, Harper. *To Kill a Mockingbird*. J.B. Lippincott & Co., 1960.
  • Walker, Alice. *The Color Purple*. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers, 1982.
  • Proulx, Annie (Editor). *Women Writing About Men*. Penguin Books USA Inc., 1996.
  • Mills, Charles W., & Eshleman A.J (Editors). *Race & Social Justice: A Global Perspective*. Sage Publications Ltd., 2009.

Learn the cost and time for your paper

1 page (275 words)
Deadline in: 0 days

No need to pay just yet!

Picture of Sophia Hale
Sophia Hale

This essay was reviewed by