Stranger Things and Frankenstein: Exploring Themes of Otherness

832 words, 2 pages, 4 min read
Topics:
Table of content

In the realm of popular culture and literature, few themes resonate as deeply as the notion of “otherness.” This theme is explored in various ways across different mediums, but two particularly compelling examples are Netflix’s “Stranger Things” and Mary Shelley’s seminal novel “Frankenstein.” Both works delve into the experiences of beings who exist on the fringes of society, embodying the fears and anxieties of their respective eras. By examining how these narratives portray otherness, we can glean insights into societal norms and human psychology.

Defining Otherness

Before diving into our analysis, let’s clarify what we mean by “otherness.” At its core, otherness refers to the state of being different or alienated from a dominant group. It often encompasses feelings of isolation, misunderstanding, and fear—elements that both “Stranger Things” and “Frankenstein” tackle with remarkable depth. In each narrative, characters who are labeled as ‘the other’ serve to reflect broader societal issues while also prompting audiences to consider empathy and understanding.

The Monster Within: Frankenstein’s Creature

Mary Shelley’s “Frankenstein,” published in 1818, introduces us to one of literature’s most iconic figures: Frankenstein’s creature. Born from Victor Frankenstein’s audacious experimentations with life and death, this creature is initially innocent but becomes a victim of society’s rejection. His grotesque appearance makes him an immediate target for fear and hostility. Rather than being embraced for his uniqueness or potential for goodness, he faces a relentless cycle of violence driven by ignorance.

This narrative speaks volumes about humanity’s tendency to ostracize those who do not conform to societal standards—whether they be physical attributes or behavioral expectations. The creature’s tragic quest for acceptance mirrors the struggles faced by many marginalized groups throughout history. As readers witness his transformation from a hopeful being seeking companionship into a vengeful figure fueled by despair, Shelley forces us to confront our own complicity in perpetuating cycles of alienation.

Eleven: A Different Kind of Outsider

Fast forward to modern times with “Stranger Things,” where we encounter Eleven—a girl with psychokinetic abilities raised in isolation within a secretive government lab. From her first appearance on screen, Eleven embodies otherness not only through her supernatural powers but also due to her traumatic past that leaves her struggling to connect with others. Much like Frankenstein’s creature, she is misunderstood; however, unlike him, she has allies in Mike and his friends who help her navigate her strange new world.

The dynamic between Eleven and her peers illustrates how friendship can bridge gaps created by difference. While she initially seems like an outcast—depicted through her shaved head and unsettling behavior—the series gradually unveils layers beneath her exterior that resonate deeply with viewers facing their own forms of isolation. It challenges the audience to reconsider what it means to belong while emphasizing that true acceptance requires seeing beyond surface-level differences.

Society’s Role in Defining Otherness

Both narratives emphasize how society plays an instrumental role in defining who is considered ‘normal’ versus ‘other.’ In “Frankenstein,” Victor embodies societal fears surrounding scientific advancement during the Industrial Revolution; his inability—or refusal—to take responsibility for his creation reflects larger anxieties about technological progress outpacing moral considerations.

In contrast, “Stranger Things” captures late 20th-century concerns regarding government secrecy and experimentation reminiscent of Cold War paranoia. The Hawkins Lab represents institutional betrayal—the very entities meant to protect society instead become sources of fear when they exploit individuals like Eleven for their agendas.

The Path Toward Empathy

A central thread weaving through both stories is an invitation toward empathy amidst otherness. Shelley encourages readers not just to sympathize with Frankenstein’s creature but also challenge themselves: What does it mean when we label someone as ‘monstrous’? Can we look beyond outward appearances? Similarly, “Stranger Things” nudges viewers toward recognizing shared humanity even when faced with extraordinary circumstances—in this case manifesting through supernatural elements intertwined with relatable teenage dilemmas.

Both works serve as powerful reminders that our instinctual reactions towards those perceived as different can often lead us astray if left unexamined. By engaging deeply with characters marked by otherness—be it through fear-driven responses or unexpected bonds—we cultivate understanding rather than distance.

The Takeaway: Lessons from Otherness

“Stranger Things” and “Frankenstein” may seem worlds apart at first glance—one steeped in gothic horror while another offers nostalgic sci-fi thrills—but they converge on crucial lessons regarding human connection amidst adversity brought forth by difference. As we navigate an increasingly polarized world today where differences can incite conflict rather than compassion—it becomes imperative that we embrace these narratives’ calls for introspection surrounding our definitions around belonging versus exclusion.

This exploration reminds us ultimately that embracing complexity—and allowing ourselves space within discomfort—is where true growth lies; something both Victor Frankenstein failed at painfully yet something which could redeem our collective future if taken seriously today!

References

  • Shelley M., Frankenstein (1818)
  • Duffer Brothers., Stranger Things (2016-present)
  • Eagleton T., The English Novel: An Introduction (2005)
  • Punter D., Gothic Experience (1996)
  • Kermode F., The Sense of an Ending (1967)

Learn the cost and time for your paper

1 page (275 words)
Deadline in: 0 days

No need to pay just yet!

Picture of Sophia Hale
Sophia Hale

This essay was reviewed by